- LIB DEMS: JUSTICE AND CRIME
- NEWS
- POLICY
- PARLIAMENT
- Counter-Terrorism Bill
- LORDS: Government failing on youth justice
- Kramer turns spotlight on financial abuse of the elderly
- Liberal Democrat peers attack Government's failing approach to data protection
- PMQs: Nick Clegg accuses Brown of "playing politics with our liberties"
- View All
- FEATURE
- ISSUES
PARLIAMENTARY REPORT
Counter-Terrorism Bill
2008
Government Department: Home
Office
Liberal Democrat Spokesperson in the Commons:
Chris Huhne
Liberal Democrat Spokesperson in the Lords: Lord
Thomas of Gresford
Government
proposals
· Extension of maximum period of pre-charge detention
for terrorist suspects to 42 days
· Changes to enable post charge
questioning of terrorist suspects and the drawing of adverse inferences from a
refusal to say something that is later relied on in court
· A
requirement for convicted terrorists to provide the police with personal
information on their release from prison and to notify any changes to this
information
· Introduction of a foreign travel order that will enable
convicted terrorists to be banned from travelling overseas
· Enhanced
sentences for those convicted of terrorist related offences
· Putting
the police counter-terrorist DNA database on a sound statutory footing and
making other changes to enable the full use of DNA in terrorist cases
· Changes to funding arrangements for protecting ‘key
sites’
Liberal Democrat response
The Liberal
Democrats recognise the serious threat posed to the British people by terrorism.
We have worked, and continue to work, with the Government to try to build a
cross-party consensus on measures to counter this threat. A number of the
proposals we have pressed for – such as post-charge questioning – have been
adopted by the Government.
However we are clear that counter-terrorism
measures must be based on clear and compelling evidence, and achieve the right
balance between security and liberty.
Our main cause for concern in the
current Bill is the Government’s proposed extension of the period of pre-charge
detention. The Liberal Democrats strongly oppose increasing the period of
detention without charge because:
· The Government have presented no
remotely convincing evidence it is needed
· It would be
counter-productive, alienating the people whose help we most need to fight
terrorism
· Detaining someone for up to 42 days without even presenting
them or their lawyer with any evidence against them is fundamentally
illiberal
· 28 days detention without trial is already longer than any
other democratic country in the world
Click here
to read more about the campaign against 42 days detention
The period of
time that people need to be detained before a charge is brought could be reduced
if the Government bring in post-charge questioning. The Liberal Democrats have
supported introducing this measure and welcome its inclusion in the
Bill.
We also support the use of intercept evidence in court. The
Government are currently engaged in a consultation on this. If introduced, we
believe this could also enable the decreasing of the period of pre-charge
detention. Most other countries allow the use of this material as evidence. We
have also suggested that lesser charges could be made and upgraded if and when
evidence of more serious crimes becomes available to the police.
We
strongly oppose the clauses on inquests. Coroners’ courts are a fundamental
bulwark against the abuse by the state of its monopoly of the legal use of
force. The Government’s proposals could allow an inquest to be held without a
jury just because the result might affect our relationship with another country,
and would give the Secretary of State extraordinary power to appoint special
coroners.
Throughout all stages we have sought to improve the Bill, and
have gained important concessions on many of the less controversial areas.
Remaining concerns that we will be pressing the Government on include the
implication for media reporting on the armed forces and a regular review for
those subject to indefinite notification requirements.
The Liberal
Democrats have consistently worked with the Government and others to agree
effective laws to tackle terrorism. But we are not willing to go along with
measures which are ineffective, illiberal and designed simply to look
tough.
Applicability (e.g.
England)
UK-wide
Further Information
First
day of the Report Stage in the Commons
Second
day of the Report Stage in the Commons
Nick Clegg attacks Government’s counter-terror proposals during
Prime Minister’s Questions
Second Reading in the Lords
Progress of the Bill
















