REFORM COMMISSION: TERMS OF REFERENCE AND PROCESS
- Terms of Reference
This review will be
very ''future focussed'' and positive in intent. Given the
stretch goal articulated by the leader we have to understand how to make our
next step change in terms of our electoral impact and just as importantly how
to build the organisation to support it The main terms
are:
- Scope
The scope will be broad and inclusive looking at all
aspects of activity that are funded directly or indirectly through or by the
party. This is a root and branch review aimed at meeting
the challenge of building a coherent and cohesive organisation.
As such the activities included in this remit of the review
commission are those managed through Cowley Street by the Federal and
English parties and by the English Regions including all
campaign staff who are employed by the party federally, nationally or
regionally, POLD, ALDC (especially given the potential activity overlaps
here with the proposed Leadership Academy) and other relevant special
associated organisations and associated organisations. Also included will be
the relationship of the Federal Party with the Scottish and Welsh parties as
this is a Federal review.
We should also consider how we best work
with party members temporarily or permanently outside Great
Britain.
- Purpose
Define and agree what the party organisation is
there to do and what parts of the party organisation should do it.
Whilst the functions and prerogatives of members are
critical the review will consider how to address the
opportunity for the party organisation to develop the role and capability to
support a much wider network of sympathisers and supporters.
- Resource Allocation
How does the party raise resources and
then allocate them to its core purpose and strategic goals?
How do we become a 21st century voluntary
organisation?
- Processes
What processes do we need and how should they
work to ensure we deliver our goals?
- Capabilities
What skills do we need where in order to
deliver our goals and how are they best developed and by
whom?
- Culture
What culture do we need to create within the paid
structure and the voluntary organisation of the Party?
- Structure
What structures would best deliver the
above?
- Governance
The purpose of the review is to create much
greater coherence and consistency, not a centralised and unresponsive
bureaucracy. It is important for the review therefore to
articulate how we make this work deliver the purpose and strategy in the
context of the constitution. At the same time it is the
case that there may be changes to the constitution that would make managing
the organisation easier and if so these will be part of the
recommendations.
- Change Management
The review should build an implementation
plan and propose stages for the changes outlined, with the objective that
this should be achieved over a period of not more than two
years.
Previous review work done in the last two or so years
will be taken into account.
- Process
- Once announced we will establish a transparent and simple approach
to our review that allows all interested stakeholders to have their say
within a short and focussed period of time. We will open up the review
to receive written proposals and opinions from the party, parliamentarians
and just as importantly staff themselves. We will use Liberal
Democrat News and email distribution lists as a vehicle to reach as
widely as we can and ask for views to be presented in the context of the
terms of reference above.
- We will put a four week period aside to receive these and indicate
a two day period when we would take oral evidence as a follow up some 2-3
weeks later. We will take oral evidence from those who
have written in where their contribution requires greater
development. We plan to have a session for oral evidence
in Cowley Street, one in the north of England and one each in Scotland and
Wales subject to receiving sufficient written
submissions.
- In addition to the wide invitation we will specifically ask a
series of member/non-member specialists to submit and follow on with an oral
session.
- We want to use the March Conference (Liverpool 8/9 March)
''session'' as a final engagement opportunity where we will air key themes
and challenges emerging from our work but not our
recommendations.
- We will issue the final report in May.